US supreme court finalizes gift of spying immunity to the telecom giants

US supreme court finalizes gift of immunity to the telecom giants | Glenn Greenwald | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk: "When civil liberties groups sued the telecoms on behalf of their customers whose communications had been illegally accessed by the government, federal courts began ruling against the telecoms, holding that the immunity they already had under the law would be unavailable to them, because the allegations against them amounted to knowing, deliberate violations of the law. As one federal judge put it in refusing to dismiss a lawsuit against AT&T: "AT&T cannot seriously contend that a reasonable entity in its position could have believed that the alleged domestic dragnet was legal."" 'via Blog this'

Net neutrality in Europe: Response to European further network neutrality co...

Net neutrality in Europe: Response to European further network neutrality co...: Dear sirs I am writing to reply to your “On-line public consultation on "specific aspects of transparency, traffic management and switch...

Regulatory Asymmetry? The Competition Between Telcos and Other ICT Players

Regulatory Asymmetry? The Competition Between Telecommunication Operators and Other ICT Players: "Jnl of Euro Competition Law & Practice Volume 3, Issue 5, Pp. 452-464. Laurent De Muyter*: "Under EU law, telecommunication operators must open their main resources (networks) to service providers including other ICT providers under far reaching and sometimes conceptually inconsistent conditions. But they have limited access to the resources operated by the latter (content, data, handset, software). This distorts competition, hampers network related investments, and makes high bids less plausible in future spectrum auctions." 'via Blog this'

Recent Uk competition cases in telecoms

"The Application of Competition Law in the Communications and Media Sector: A Survey of 2010 Cases: Journal of European Competition Law & Practice first published online May 15, 2011"
'via Blog this'Recent UK competition cae

ETNO's WCIT proposals are not as bad as some say, they're worse

ENDitorial: The ETNO's WCIT proposals are not as bad as some say | EDRI: " ETNO's proposals would squeeze every ounce of innovation and competition out of global Internet networks. Goodbye Internet, hello Minitel.
The concept sounds quite friendly and just a little esoteric: “Sending party pays” (SPP). That sounds fair, until you realise that the sending party already pays. It sounds fair until you realise that SPP has always been the principle in the mobile world, and the result of this principle is tens of billions of Euro wasted by citizens on untransparent, unjustified and, frequently, unjustifiable charges. Years of regulatory action has finally led to the most egregious of these problems finally being solved in Europe." 'via Blog this'

British Telecom could be overcharging taxpayer £100ms for rural broadband

British Telecom could be overcharging taxpayer hundreds of millions of pounds - Telegraph: "according to a leaked Whitehall briefing, officials at the Culture, Media and Sport department have been told the broadcasting giant is charging a mark up of up to 80 per cent to introduce faster broadband in rural parts of the country. The document, compiled in the summer by a consultant who was working with the department, accuses BT of using “pseudo wholesale” figures to justify its costs. Experts said that if the forecasts are correct, BT's subsidy could be cut by £400million and £500million and still produce the same result. Experts say it could mean that home owners in rural parts of the country have to overpay through their council tax bills for the faster broadband.
Last night Margaret Hodge MP, the chairman of the Public Accounts Committee, said she was shocked by The Telegraph’s disclosures and said her committee would examine the claims as part of a new inquiry." 'via Blog this'

Role and procedures of BEREC

Role and procedures of BEREC: "Articles 7 and 7a of the Framework Directive the findings of market definition, SMP assessment and – if applicable - the proposed remedies have to be notified to the Commission and other NRAs. The aim of this EU notification, the so-called Article 7 procedure, is to contribute to the development of a single market in electronic communications by ensuring co-operation among NRAs, and between NRAs and the Commission.
Once an NRA notifies the Commission of its proposed measure the case is assessed by the Commission within one month. At the end of this period and provided that the notified measure does not raise “serious doubts” as to its compatibility with EU law, the Commission may decide to comment. Regulators should take account of these comments before adopting the draft measure in question. When the Commission expresses serious doubts and opens a so-called Phase II, its investigation period is extended for two months more in the Article 7 cases, or for three months more in the Article 7a investigations. If this situation occurs, BEREC has to issue an opinion,,," 'via Blog this'

House of Lords - Broadband for all - an alternative vision

House of Lords - Broadband for all - an alternative vision - Communications Committee: "In our view, the benefits of opening up the restrictions on PIA are likely to be significant, particularly were policy to be re-oriented towards the establishment of open access fibre-optic hubs, as we advocate. Removing the restrictions on PIA may, of course, have knock-on effects for the effectiveness and coherence of other aspects of the overall regulatory edifice...234. ...since May 2011, Ofcom has had the power by virtue of Article 12 of the Revised EU Framework Directive, transposed into UK law, to impose regulatory obligations with regard to infrastructure sharing in the broadband market without reference to SMP." 'via Blog this'

Network access charges imposed by BT unjustified, Court of Appeal rules

Network access charges imposed by BT on rivals were unjustified, Court of Appeal rules: "The Court rejected claims by BT that the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) had not acted in accordance with EU telecoms laws when it considered whether what it had charged rivals was acceptable. Instead it ruled that BT's prices had served to distort the market to the detriment of its rivals and consumers.
Virgin Media and Cable & Wireless were among the telecoms firms that had challenged whether BT had breached charging restrictions imposed on it by the UK's telecoms regulator.
Ofcom had conducted an investigation into the 'partial private circuits' (PPCs) market in 2004." 'via Blog this'

Margin squeeze modelling can be simple or complicated, but never trivial

Margin squeeze modelling can be simple or complicated, but never trivial - Analysys Mason Group: "The legal work surrounding margin (or price) squeeze allegations is extensive and complex. However, in these cases some kind of margin squeeze model will be used, which will form the foundation to prove or disprove the legal case. The margin squeeze model will present the underlying numerical comparison of costs, prices (revenue) and profit margins relevant to the business situation being tested. Margin squeeze models can be simple or complicated, and the choices made will always be argued to fit the case in question. These choices (which we structure as scale, scope, financial test and cost/price principles) strongly affect the complexity of the margin model, its inputs, assumptions, calculations and outputs" 'via Blog this'

Article 7a of the EU telecoms Framework Directive

Article 7a of the EU telecoms Framework Directive: first thoughts on second guessing a second guess - Newsletter – Analysys Mason Quarterly - News | Analysys Mason Group: "Commission has recently issued a significant number of 7a 'Phase 2' letters. Each of these requires BEREC to respond within six weeks. Insiders have told us that this is placing a significant burden on the NRAs (which provide the manpower to BEREC); given the restricted duration, the process requires NRA experts to make decisions (about whether they agree with the draft BEREC approach) within days, even if the relevant expert in that NRA is on leave or fully busy in their own country. Many NRAs do not have sufficient resources to contribute fully.
Secondly, BEREC has always agreed with the Commission – until last month, when it disagreed with half of the Commission's reasoning in a case related to mobile termination in France. This is probably a positive development overall, showing that the system of 'checks and balances' can work. Nevertheless, BEREC is making rapid decisions about issues that are important and have wider implications than the narrow cases involved, which could lead to bad precedents being set." 'via Blog this'

Brussels backs down on telecoms pricing - FT.com

Brussels backs down on telecoms pricing - FT.com: "Investors in large telecoms groups had feared further pressure on revenues amid need to spend more on fibre networks. Nick Delfas, analyst at Morgan Stanley, said the proposals remove the potential negative of falling prices and should help build investor confidence over time.
Kroes said the new policy aimed to boost the investment in fibre networks for fast internet connections by allowing incumbent telecom groups to maintain charges for access to their existing copper infrastructure and so guaranteeing stable returns." 'via Blog this'

EC challenges regulatory remedies: Netherlands wholesale call termination / Denmark wholesale SMS MT

From T-Regs: The European Commission has, for the first time, 'proceeded all the way' through the Art 7a FD procedure and has formally issued a Recommendation to an NRA requiring it to amend or withdraw proposed regulatory obligations ('remedies'). The case at hand concerns the OPTA (Netherlands) notification for wholesale fixed call termination and wholesale mobile call termination.

The European Commission's press release is accessible via:http://tre.gs/4n 

OPTA has also issued a press release, accessible via: http://tre.gs/4p

Update 25 June 2012: The European Commission's Recommendation has been published: European Commission Recommendation C(2012) 3770 in Case NL/2012/1284

Diplomatic Arm-Wrestling Over Scope Of WCIT (ITU Treaty)

Diplomatic Arm-Wrestling Over Scope Of International Telecommunication Regulations Treaty | Intellectual Property Watch: "Among the hotly debated high-level issues was that if ITU recommendations become mandatory instead of voluntary. This could shift ITU standards into quasi-legal norms and give them privileges over standards from other standardization bodies. Yet the 47-member European regional group, represented by the Conférence Européenne des Administrations des Postes et des Télécommunications (CEPT, one of six regional groups at ITU), warned the ITR could “not be used to change the non-binding nature of ITU recommendations.” Other issues of contention are additional provisions on security, from anti-spam provisions to the obligation to provide a calling line identification (CLI), potentially also for internet telephony, to allow tracking misuse. 
Internet telephony using SIP protocol is seen by some ITU member states as siphoning off revenues from classic telephony providers, as a statement by Iran’s ITU representative made clear. African countries want to see cost-based transit, termination, and roaming rates, transparency, and an effort from member states to act against asymmetries of charging. The US favours a completely hands-off approach, and Europe is trying to get compromise on administrations pushing for economic efficiency, competition and price transparency for customers.

Compromise about the paragraph on charging for international telecommunication services given the diametrically opposed proposals, on one hand leave charging to the market (as proposed by the US and also CEPT) versus having regulators involved in the pricing on the other hand (as proposed by the Arab states, but also Russia) are still on the to-do list for the last prep meeting in June. From the point of view of the IP address managers, what is even more scary are considerations with regard to state intervention on routing. 'via Blog this'

Europe's Broadband Implementation Strategy

Europe's Information Society Newsroom: "Commission has now published a Staff Working Document. It summarises the current state of play in national broadband plans and fosters a mutually beneficial exchange of knowledge on good practices between countries by assembling examples of national implementation measures."
'via Blog this'

Competition Appeals Tribunal slashes mobile phone termination rate cuts

Competition Appeals Tribunal slashes mobile phone termination rate cuts, going beyond Ofcom's rates - Competition Policy International (CPI): to 0.65p per minute by 2015 (about 0.8eurocents)

'via Blog this'

Commission suspends discriminatory Danish SMS price regulation

EUROPA - Press Releases - Digital Agenda: Commission suspends discriminatory Danish SMS price regulation and starts an in-depth review: " expressed similar concerns regarding the discrimination of SMS coming from operators providing telecommunication services in other Member States. Howev"

'via Blog this'

UK broadband speed climbs 22 percent

UK broadband speed climbs 22 percent | Networking | ZDNet UK: note that this reflects a shift to fibre in cities...

'via Blog this'

Li Ka-shing’s Hutchison finally sees 3G profits

BBC News - Li Ka-shing’s Hutchison finally sees 3G profits:

'via Blog this'

For real? How mobile oligopolies work...France

For real? « Chillin'Competition:

'via Blog this'

UMG vs Veoh - what content giants can do to start-ups

UNCENSORED - A personal experience with DMCA - UMG vs Veoh - minglewing:

'via Blog this'

NBN Co unclogs sign-up pipeline • The Register

NBN Co unclogs sign-up pipeline • The Register:

'via Blog this'

Submarine Cable Map

Submarine Cable Map:

'via Blog this'

ECJ confirms that special (lower) tax on France Télécom was state aid

“to tax him with injustice”*: ECJ confirms that special (lower) tax on France Télécom was state aid : contentandcarrier:

'via Blog this'

National judges' implementation seminar 28 November

Agenda here: 'via Blog this'

COCOM agenda for 46th Meeting

See the agenda online for Member States' meeting: 'via Blog this'

Commission presses 16 Member States to implement new EU telecoms rules

EUROPA - Press Releases - Digital Agenda: Commission presses 16 Member States to implement new EU telecoms rules:

'via Blog this'

Implementation & Enforcement - Country reports

European Commission - Information Society - Telecommunications, Communications and Services - Implementation & Enforcement - Country by country tables and reports:

'via Blog this'

Spain and Germany: margin squeeze remedies and regulatory holidays

Spain: Telefonica in 2008 lost a margin squeeze case, and received a record fine - much higher than Deutsche Telekom (Germany) and France Telecom-Wanadoo (France). Is this justified? The CJEU upheld the DT fine in October 2010.
Germany: the regulator granted DT a regulatory holiday to deploy its VDSL network - was this unfair on competitors? Did it fragment the European market? The CJEU thought so.

Updated Infringement proccedings

From Europa: 'via Blog this'

Infringement procedures on telecoms

eCommunications: Infringement procedures | Europa - Information Society:

'via Blog this'

Commission requests Greece to implement rules to facilitate telecom networks roll-out

EUROPA - Press Releases - Digital Agenda: Commission requests Greece to implement rules to facilitate telecom networks roll-out:

'via Blog this'

UK to auction 800 MHz and 2.6 GHz spectrum in 2012 | Watching the Connectives

UK to auction 800 MHz and 2.6 GHz spectrum in 2012 | Watching the Connectives:

'via Blog this'

ECTA / REPORTS / WIK Studies / WIK Study - Apr 2011

ECTA / REPORTS / WIK Studies / WIK Study - Apr 2011:

'via Blog this'

UK delays 800 MHz and 2.6 GHz spectrum auctions until late 2012 | Watching the Connectives

UK delays 800 MHz and 2.6 GHz spectrum auctions until late 2012 | Watching the Connectives:

'via Blog this'

Clearest basic explanation of transition from copper to fibre?

Very clear IDC New Zealand presentation - for we lawyers, not technologists...

How a digital telephone exchange works

An illustrated guide!

Case studies in UK fibre-to-the-curb broadband

With deadlines of 2015, Cornwall used European money and BT partnership with 138,000km of fibre, Cambridgeshire thinks it can get £42m private investment within the total £70m budget (£8m from central government) and offer about 90% coverage of ADSL2+ or faster technology. Good luck to both!

Romania implementation of 2002 Directive

The new European framework for electronic communications

UK Telecoms at a glance...

Here and here (in detail).

TeleFrieden: Wireless Cost Per Minute and Consumer Behavior

TeleFrieden: Wireless Cost Per Minute and Consumer Behavior: " It has become a largely unquestioned “fact” that U.S. wireless consumers enjoy remarkably low per minute costs rivaling what the ..."

Rural wholesale broadband price drops

Ofcom in the UK has announced new price cuts of 12% below inflation for wholesale BT products in the 11% of the UK with absolutely no retail competition. They must be desperately hoping that this results in some kind of competition to reduce the need for government funding for higher speed services.

Translation of Dutch net neutralit...

Net neutrality in Europe: Bits of Freedom translation of Dutch net neutralit...: "Despite some obfuscation (and the need for the Senate to undo the messy ideological filtering amendment which confused MPs voted for !), the..."

"Every other European digital"? New scorecard data...

Net neutrality in Europe: "Every other European digital"? New scorecard data...: "The EC has made a classic centralised targeting mistake - it wants every European to be able to access 2Mbps broadband by 2013 . Only one a..."

Ofcom changes general conditions and universal service conditions

25 May - another response to the need to put in place amendments to the EComms framework went ahead following a statutory consultation. It changes consumer contract requirements, as well as the USO conditions on BT and Kingston.

Ofcom issues new EComms dispute guidelines for 2011

Following changes to the Authorisation Directive in EC/2009/136, Ofcom has very substantially toughened and streamlined its own dispute powers following a consultation with stakeholders. Examples are rapid dispute settlement procedures and a maximum fine for lack of required telco data increased from £50,000 to £2,000,000.

NZ: fibre wholesaler to be TelecomNZ - with regulator holiday for rest of decade?

This is what you call deregulation (well, there's a price cap), from the country that for a decade until 2001 pretended it did not need a telecoms regulator. Well, they barely have broadband unbundled and no cable to speak of, so perhaps their conservative government thinks it has to roll over and beg? "Telecommunications (TSO, Broadband, and Other Matters) Bill and recommended it become law, if several changes are made. The bill paves the way for the Government's $1.35 billion ultra-fast broadband scheme, which plans to lay fibre internet cables across 75 per cent of New Zealand over the next 10 years...the law would remove the Commerce Commission's ability to regulate price on the broadband network until December 31, 2019. The committee made its decision on advice from Crown officials that the forbearance would result in lower wholesale and retail prices "by removing the risk premium" for investors." No kidding it removes risk...competition...progress...
UPDATE: The indigenous Maori Party (which represents rural constituencies in the main) slammed a couple of torpedoes into the regulatory holiday in debate on 17 May - so it's not going to be allowed, thankfully for NZ consumers.

Incumbents' views: Telefonica exceptions in Article 102 are wrong

Well-written and well-argued but ultimately unconvincing view taken from the law'n'economics mainstream on competition law.

Case C‑52/09, Konkurrensverket v TeliaSonera AB: margin squeeze under Art.102

Note - this refers to conduct dating to April 2000! Court (First Chamber) hereby rules:

In the absence of any objective justification, the fact that a vertically integrated undertaking, holding a dominant position on the wholesale market in asymmetric digital subscriber line input services, applies a pricing practice of such a kind that the spread between the prices applied on that market and those applied in the retail market for broadband connection services to end users is not sufficient to cover the specific costs which that undertaking must incur in order to gain access to that retail market may constitute an abuse within the meaning of Article 102 TFEU.

When assessing whether such a practice is abusive, all of the circumstances of each individual case should be taken into consideration. In particular:

–        as a general rule, primarily the prices and costs of the undertaking concerned on the retail services market should be taken into consideration. Only where it is not possible, in particular circumstances, to refer to those prices and costs should those of competitors on the same market be examined, and

–        it is necessary to demonstrate that, taking particular account of whether the wholesale product is indispensable, that practice produces an anti-competitive effect, at least potentially, on the retail market, and that the practice is not in any way economically justified.

The following factors are, as a general rule, not relevant to such an assessment:

–        the absence of any regulatory obligation on the undertaking concerned to supply asymmetric digital subscriber line input services on the wholesale market in which it holds a dominant position;

–        the degree of dominance held by that undertaking in that market;

–        the fact that that undertaking does not also hold a dominant position in the retail market for broadband connection services to end users;

–        whether the customers to whom such a pricing practice is applied are new or existing customers of the undertaking concerned;

–        the fact that the dominant undertaking is unable to recoup any losses which the establishment of such a pricing practice might cause, or

–        the extent to which the markets concerned are mature markets and whether they involve new technology, requiring high levels of investment.

Ofcom settles and closes case brought against BT in March 2002

Which means that this was brewing up in late 2001 - before I joined WorldCom (which feels several centuries ago) - when BT had a joint venture with Yahoo!  and an appalling content portal called Openworld (known as Open Woe). To claim they were not price squeezing shows that Oftel and then Ofcom could not work out BT's accounting properly.

BEREC publish about 50 documents

You wait all year for a document then fifty turn up at once! Note net neutrality consultation response and draft work programme for 2011.

ITU useful stats: 2billion web users, 5.3billion mobiles

More stats in their ICT2010 document: "subscriptions to IMT2000/3G services have increased from 72 million in 2005 to 940 million in 2010. As many as 143 countries are offering IMT2000/3G services commercially, up from 95 countries in 2007. Over the past year, mobile broadband has experienced steep growth, especially in Europe and the United States, and some countries have started to offer commercial services at even higher broadband speeds, moving to next generation wireless platforms. The trend from voice to (mobile) data applications is reflected in the growing number of SMS, or text messages sent, which tripled over the past three years to reach a staggering 6.1 trillion in 2010. In other words, close to 200 000 text messages are sent every second. Overall, the price of ICT services is falling, but high-speed Internet access remains prohibitively expensive, especially in low-income developing countries. In 2009, an entry-level fixed (wired) broadband connection cost on average 190 PPP$ (Purchasing power parity in USD) per month in developing countries, compared to only 28 PPP$ in developed countries. Mobile cellular services are much more affordable, with an average monthly cost of 15 PPP$ in developing countries compared to around 18 PPP$ in developed countries. The relative price for ICT services (especially broadband) is highest in Africa, the region with the lowest income levels. The region lags behind when it comes to broadband access. Although subscriptions are increasing, a penetration rate of less than 1 per cent for fixed broadband illustrates the huge challenges that persist to increase access to high-speed, high-capacity Internet."

Competition Commission judges on LLU - latest of 5 appeals in two years

The CC has delivered a 513-page judgment on Carphone Warehouse (now TalkTalk) in its appeal against the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) decision in LLU - and has decided that it needs to review its procedures now that it has had to rule on its fifth price control appeal in two years.

Kenyan mobile: textbook example of using interconnection and on-off-net parity

Very interesting case study of a country with an operator taking 80% market share - and how to stop it undercutting rivals.

Forthcoming ECJ cases

Contentandcarrier keeps its excellent analysis coming.

CEPS study on Turkish telecoms and EC accession

Does anyone know who funded this research? Lots of interesting analysis packaged as an Impact Assessment.

Ed Richards (Ofcom CEO) on ex ante/ex post approaches and review of Ofcom decisions

A very thoughtful and considered speech on how Ofcom uses its powers and the benefits of static versus dynamic assessments of competition.

2010 update: freely available materials

For those who cannot afford £80 for publicly available materials, they are also freely available in:

this EC document (updated February 2010): 

and on the following websites:

1. BEREC/ERG common positions:

2. Article 7 proceedings

3. EC caselaw (updated February 2010) (right side)

Ofcom to cut mobile termination rates to 0.5p/min by 2014

Good news for consumers and fixed line operators - though mobiles will appeal to the CAT.

Polish regulator over-eager to regulate Internet exchanges

The EC has just made its first Article 7 decision since Neelie Kroes became INFSO Commissioner - that Poland's regulator misregulated in designating the incumbent as dominant in IP transit and interconnect. Its an important case, because of this reasoning.

Universal service and Directory Inquiries - complex UK reference to ECJ

Its here - and focuses on whether Ofcom was right to interpret universal service for number listing as an obligation at wholesale level on BT. The European Court will consider it in 2010.

Broadband mobile roaming in Europe

Here's the link the 2009 EC Decision on roaming.

US FCC - about to do what was threatened in 2002?

Is Chair Genachowski about to release lots and lots of spectrum for broadband? If so, he'll be implementing this plan.

Leased lines in UK - dispute affecting 2004-8

A potentially £100million dispute is dragging through the Competition Appeal Tribunal after an appeal by BT from Ofcom's ruling concerning the cost of business broadband lines - dating back to 2004. I spent 2002 working on the previous round of the same dispute!!!

When telecoms operators go bad - court enforcement and delays

Ofcom is now taking a Birmingham-based telephone company to court - at least 30 months after accounts of abuse came to light - is this too slow?
"Ofcom’s monitoring of Telephonics’ behaviour in relation to a section 94 notification which was issued to Telephonics on 20 March 2009, and which concluded that there were reasonable grounds for believing that since at least 1 June 2008, Telephonics had contravened, and was contravening, General Condition 1.2 of the General Conditions of Entitlement (GC 1.2)

As set out in the Section 95 and 96 Notification, Ofcom has concluded that Telephonics has:

1. contravened General Condition 1.2 (“GC1.2”) by misusing information obtained for the purpose of facilitating a transfer, by incorrectly applying the Cancel Other facility and engaging in Inappropriate Save Activity;
2. failed to take steps to comply with GC 1.2; and
3. failed to remedy the consequences of its contravention of GC 1.2."

Consumer and EU issues are dealt with in this commercial conference - always worth asking if you can attend as an observer for the second day (they will hum and haw but you might get in).

Structural remedies and Ofcom

Interesting self-congratulatory Ofcom paper on OpenReach - as well as a nice piece on ECJ potential cases. Its also worth noting that the Digital Economy Bill rumbles on with a government response to an online petition against cutting off connections.

BEREC gets busy on Phase 2 EC market reviews

The Independent Regulators Group - forerunner to BEREC - has issued various opinions on EC market reviews.

Ho do you judge independence of NRAs?

Interesting 2004 paper by Irene Wu of the FCC, with an 18-country study of NRA governance.

WorldCom fraud and its systemic effects on telco-ISP competition

Interesting paper on what happens when a single large actor in the interconnected world of telecoms engages in systematic fraud over several years - leading others to over-invest, hurting bilateral relations between carriers, and leading to 'competitive bankruptcy in which many of WorldCom's rivals had to seek new ownership or Chapter 11 protection. Those who avoided bankruptcy and forced restructuring were left in the worst position of all.

Why the European Commission had to reform the Directives

Huge an hugely influential BT-sponsored report, including especially work of Anders Henten, Jonathan Cave, Brian Williamson, and above all, Martin Cave - their recommendations were followed virtually to the letter where constitutionally possible (limiting length of national court processes was in the end too much to expect the Council of Ministers to accept).

Jim Speta on Internet regulation/net neutrality law

Fascinating and excellent paper.

3 February: deadline for UK on T-Mobile/Orange merger

OFT formally petitioned the European Commission to have the case referred. This will allow local evaluation of how the merger of T-Mobile and Orange will impact the UK mobile market, with a view to what restrictions should be placed on such a merger. T-Mobile and Orange were hoping that an EU-level investigation, with its 90-day turnaround, would wave through the merger with minimal concessions on either side. But, conversely, it would be a victory for the competition, who'd like nothing more than a lengthy investigation during which Orange and T-Mobile are effectively paralysed in the UK market.

New European Directives must be implemented by June 19, 2011

See this link to the Package of reforms.

Ofcom rules on 'cost-orientation' and leased lines

Interesting ruling on whether BT over-charged by £40m to competitors who lease its broadband backhaul.

Commission wins German 'regulatory holidays' case?

The Advocate General's Opinion of 23 April 2009 in C-424/07 Commission v. Germany analyzed by 'Contentandcarrier'.

Commission's 14th Implementation Report

Published yesterday: a full report, as well as individual Member State chapters.

Links to other sources

Here's more on BERT/GERT/IRG etc. and on ECTA's Regulatory Scorecard.

European Parliament caps roaming charges on mobile

Note that the caps are still very high prices and EP socialists tried to ensure lower caps by 2011. 

50cents a Megabyte for data is $500 for a Gigabyte, which is 1% of your monthly allowance on most fixed broadband. Yup, that's $50,000 a month if you used your laptop to access your total fixed broadband in France this month...

Euro Parliament second Reading vote 21-23 April?

It looks like the telecoms package will be considered just after Easter...

Some basic links on net neutrality

This ZDNet blog post describes briefly why some traffic management is necessary, as does this magisterial introduction by Prof. Ed Felten. Also note Prof. Rob Frieden explaining the common carriage debate and its application to Verizon's new product.

Net neutrality reading

For next week, read the Impact Assessment sections 5, 6,.4 and 9.2 and search for "Larouche" and "SSRN". He has a 2008 article that you should read, on net neutrality and European law options.

Deutsche Telekom 'regulatory holiday' for VDSL

The German regulator is being sued in the ECJ for giving DT a break from competition for the VDSL product- case pending after 2 years....it has history with DT in the ECJ, as in this margin squeeze case (undercharging its retail arm compared to competitors).

Herbert Ungerer on regulatory and competition challenges for broadband

Deputy Director General of DG Competition explains his perspective in a new article..

Impact Assessment document for EC on reforming regulatory package

The document is the Commission staff explanation of why they feel the 2002 package needs reforming and strengthening. You can search through it for the various [1] Directives, [2] net neutrality/Internet freedom and [3] regulatory agency reforms they feel are necessary.

European case law on telecommunications

The decisions are essentially a long list of victories for the EC over member states who failed to enforce correctly, but there's a 2007 publication and 2008 update, as well as a list of current infringement actions.

Two summaries of CAT decision on mobile termination

A good journalistic explanation and a more complete legal firm's analysis

Remaning seminars

Seminar 5: Mobile Networks and Network Remedies

[2008] CAT 12, 20 May 2008: Case(s): 1092/3/3/07 British Telecommunications plc v Office of Communications (Termination Rate Dispute) at http://www.catribunal.org.uk/238-1928/Judgment-%28Core-issues%29.html

Chapter 6. Authorisation and Licensing, Anne Flanagan

Sandbach, J. (2001) Levering open the local loop: shaping BT for competition 3 info 3 at 195-202

Cave, Martin (2002) Is LoopCo the answer? 4 info 4 at 25-31

Seminar 6: Broadband Regulation

Cadman, R. and Dineen, C. (2005) Broadband Access Markets in Europe: Why Regulation should Promote Competition at http://www.spcnetwork.co.uk/uploads/20040315_investment_paper.pdf

OfCom (2006) Next Generation Networks: Developing the regulatory framework, March, at http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/nxgnfc/statement/ngnstatement.pdf

Voice over IP and NGNs

Seminar 7: Network Neutrality

Chapter 12. Content Regulation: Broadcasting, Internet, Premium Rate Services , Nick Higham

Whitt, Rick (2005) Living on the Deep Edge: The Nature of Innovation, The Emerging Internet-Based Ecosystem, And Some Implications for U.S. Broadband Policy, mimeo presented at http://lgst.wharton.upenn.edu/cmcl/

Seminar 8: International and Comparative Telecoms Agencies

Drake, W. Chapter 5 in Marsden, C., ed. Regulating the Global Information Society (Routledge, 2000) Chapter 13. The National and International Regulatory Regimes, Ian Walden

Marcus, Scott (2005) Is the US dancing to a different drummer? 60 Communications et Strategies pp39-58

Naftel, Mark and Spiwak, Lawrence (2001) The Telecoms Trade War, Hart Publishing, http://www.phoenix-center.org/telindex.html

OECD (2006) DSTI/ICCP/TISP(2005)6/FINAL January 11: ‘Telecommunication Regulatory Institutional Structures And Responsibilities’ at http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/56/11/35954786.pdf

Seminar 9: Developing Countries, Technology Bypass and Universal Service

Chapter 15. Telecommunications Reform in Developing Countries

Local loop unbundling: terminology

Useful glossary available here, and Oftel 2001 direction here. The progress is found here and here.

WTO 10th anniversary seminar

To mark the decade since the Basic Agreement on Telecoms, the WTO held a seminar a year ago - particularly note Peter Cowhey's presentation at the bottom of the page.

13th Implementation report and ofcom broadband speed report

For next week, you will pick a major EU country - one of UK, Germany, Italy, France, Netherlands - and give a 5-minute slide presentation on their performance according to the 13th Implementation Report. 

For the UK, note the latest performance report on broadband speed, demonstrating that maxmum speeds drop off significantly in evening 'rush hour'.

CEPS report on NRF and Turkey/Romania

Report based on discussions with MEPs, NRAs etc.

Canadian telecoms policy

See the latest work on Canada's regulation - from an anti-market perspective? "For Sale to the Highest Bidder - Telecom Policy in Canada"

Week 6 - market definition

You’ll give a 90-120 second presentation on:
Your chosen market;
How it is defined;
What it replaces in previous markets (so far as we can tell);
Why they were abolished.

Do work in pairs!

Use these sources:
The press release on new markets:
Also infringement proceedings and further proceedings.
In this source above, check the type of infringement and then use the IP number in the right hand column to make a Google search for the document. Then just present that document as an example of the problem in defining the market.
Here are press releases related to infringements:

Here are those markets again – the original 18 are in the De Streel article with their explanations.
Retail level
1. Access to the public telephone network at a fixed location for residential and non-residential customers.
Wholesale level
2. Call origination on the public telephone network provided at a fixed location.
For the purposes of this Recommendation, call origination is taken to include call conveyance, delineated in such a
way as to be consistent, in a national context, with the delineated boundaries for the market for call transit and for call
termination on the public telephone network provided at a fixed location.
3. Call termination on individual public telephone networks provided at a fixed location.
For the purposes of this Recommendation, call termination is taken to include call conveyance, delineated in such a
way as to be consistent, in a national context, with the delineated boundaries for the market for call origination and
the market for call transit on the public telephone network provided at a fixed location.
4. Wholesale (physical) network infrastructure access (including shared or fully unbundled access) at a fixed location.
5. Wholesale broadband access.
This market comprises non-physical or virtual network access including ‘bit-stream’ access at a fixed location. This
market is situated downstream from the physical access covered by market 4 listed above, in that wholesale broadband
access can be constructed using this input combined with other elements.
6. Wholesale terminating segments of leased lines, irrespective of the technology used to provide leased or dedicated
capacity.
7. Voice call termination on individual mobile networks.

Did anybody get involved in writing this summary of the Turkish situation?

Week 7 - Voice over IP regulation

Here’s a link to an ITU workshop a year ago on the subject.

Week 8 - independent regulators

Read the first 25 pages of the evaluation of the ECMA proposed pan-European market:

Also read the robust Ofcom response.

You might also refresh yourself on the Do Shin article which you received last term in LW652, on convergence and market structure.

EC advisors' reports

Note the most recent consultants’ reports for the EC.

Background reading for the course

Freeserve v. Oftel (2003) case is available. ONLY read paragraphs 6-131 for next week.

You will also find here the 12th Implementation Report (March 2007) – read the main text and the Annex on the UK.

Note that the second page of the course introduction offers a choice of background books for the course – particularly Angel and Walden (2005) and Laffont and Tirole (2001) – try to access one of these, especially if you’re new to telecoms.

More on European super-regulator and NN

Conference at the end of 2006 when the plans were first emerging - I have the full conference book. If you'd like it, email me.

Net neutrality controversy

Net neutrality discussed in the news in 2006 and then up to date with the BBC iPlayer

Local Loop Unbundling Directive

18 December 2000 - at the height of the dot-com crash and just prior to the telecoms crash.